On 07/27/13 12:17 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
No. I just took the patch as committed, but you're right, const for both makes more sense -- attached.@@ -321,11 +321,10 @@ WSReadInput(InputInfoPtr·pInfo) } static·void -printWsType(char·*type,·char·*devname) +printWsType(const·char·*type,·const·char·*name) { -····xf86Msg(X_PROBED,·"%s:·Keyboard·type:·%s\n",·devname,·type);· +····xf86Msg(X_PROBED,·"%s:·Keyboard·type:·%s\n",·name,·type); } #endif
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> -- -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
