Am Mittwoch, den 21.08.2013, 16:17 -0300 schrieb Paulo Zanoni: > I did some research on these font licenses in 2010: checked their > licenses and also compared Fedora and Debian packaging. I think I sent > an email to xorg-devel, but I can't find it. Here's some of my > conclusions: https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=38627#c6 . But > I'm not a laywer, I may be completely wrong.
I think that the copy of the Utopia font in X.org should get updated with the license text from the TeX User Group: http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/mirrors/CTAN/fonts/utopia/LICENSE-utopia.txt Especially the first paragraph make me confident that the license applies to X.org as well. It contains one additional restriction regarding the renaming of derived fonts, but that is demanded for in other OSI-approved font licenses as well, e.g. Open Font License. Anything is better than the ambigious license that the font is currently released under. By the way, The TeX User Group's release of the font is part of texlive and has already been accepted into Debian's main section. - Fabian _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
