>> [...]  Has X.org given up on portability to systems where all-bits-0
>> is not a nil pointer?  [...]
> Yes.  [...lots of other such cases...]

> Do you know of any such systems X was ever ported to?

No - not that I've gone looking, mind you.  But that's hardly
surprising; X making such assumptions makes the porting effort a lot
higher in such cases.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to