On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > That will hopefully catch which path is consuming too much time > > This is what I got: > > restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[-1] (17, 0, 0)
Suspiciously like we block for an entire vrefresh to submit one batch. Hmm, do you mind sending me your complete Xorg.0.log? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
