> GPLv3 Autoconf licensing still an issue? Well, I think use of autoconf at all is an issue. But I also think GPLv3 is an issue; I've tried to read v3 twice, and even after both times, I've still missed big chunks. If I have to hire a lawyer to make sense of the license, it's (IMO) inappropriate for open-source work no matter _what_ it actually turns out to permit.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
