Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:13:28PM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> I'm not a fan at all. This API is really bad compared to what's provided by >> libbacktrace, which is super simple. This also seem to require callbacks >> that have "Linux" in the name. Why are we trying to get rid of >> libbacktrace, and what's the schedule for this? > > we're getting rid of libunwind, which was merged after 1.14 and isn't > available on e.g. RHEL and apparently not required either. as for > libbacktrace - haven't dealt with it yet, so I can't comment much on it. > > schedule - asap, before the 1.15 release would be nice so we don't introduce > a dependency that we don't need.
Are you OK with the current conditional dependency on libunwind? We could easily add a '--with-libunwind' and disable it by default so that the build would be consistent independent of whether libunwind was accidentally installed. Sorting this out before 1.15 seems like a good idea. -- [email protected]
pgpFa7l1RZ9Og.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
