* Alan Coopersmith ([email protected]) wrote:
> As we expand our use of shared memory via the new extensions, we should try
> to make sure we're not making more problems along the lines of those mentioned
> in the presentation linked below & associated whitepaper published at:
> http://labs.portcullis.co.uk/whitepapers/memory-squatting-attacks-on-system-v-shared-memory/
> 
> (It does seem most of the issues are in the clients creating shmem insecurely
>  before passing it to the X libraries, but I've not had time to do much 
> analysis
>  beyond a quick readthrough of the slides & paper.)

The clients having to implement all the shm glue themselves can't have
helped; if that was all implemented in an X library call there wouldn't have 
been
anywhere near as many screwups.

Dave

-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to