Hi,

On 12/12/2013 02:31 PM, Laércio de Sousa wrote:
Hans,

systemd currently ships a multi-seat-x wrapper 
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/login/multi-seat-x.c) for 
cases where X.Org doesn't work well with multiseat. In the beginning, it was 
much bigger, but now, as X.Org evolves, it now only does the following:

* If "-seat" option value is "seat0", just exec real X server, with no additions
* Otherwise:
   + Append "-sharevts" to real X server command line [*]
   + Append "-config" to real X server command line, with the following config 
file:
       Section "ServerFlags"
         Option "AutoAddDevices" "True" # pointless, since it's already true by 
default
         Option "AllowEmptyInput" "True" # this option doesn't exist anymore
         Option "DontVTSwitch" "True" [*]
       EndSection
       Section "InputClass"
         Identifier "Force Input Devices to Seat"
         Option "GrabDevice" "True" # not needed anymore, since 
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=c73c36b537f996574628e69681833ea37dec2b6e
       EndSection

The points tagged with [*] above are needed because non-seat0 X servers still 
try to open VTs, although non-seat0 seats can't handle them. My patch proposed 
at http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-December/039353.html makes those 
points unneeded.

Thanks for the explanation, I've one small nitpick on your patch,
if you can resend it with that fixed I'll add it to what is swiftly growing
into my systemd integration tree :)

--- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c
@@ -545,7 +545,8 @@ InitOutput(ScreenInfo * pScreenInfo, int argc, char **argv)
                 want_hw_access = TRUE;

             if (!(flags & HW_SKIP_CONSOLE))
-                xorgHWOpenConsole = TRUE;
+                /* Non-seat0 X servers should not open console */
+                xorgHWOpenConsole = !ServerIsNotSeat0();
         }

         if (xorgHWOpenConsole)

Can you please make the !ServerIsNotSeat0() part of the if condition,
rather then using it as the value to store ?   Since this is just
another way of expressing SKIP_CONSOLE it seems more sensible to me
that way.

Thanks & Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to