On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:06 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Most of the DMX warnings are in the GLX code, iirc, which I'll hopefully
> > be gutting in 1.16, so that's fine with me.
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> > Everything but 9, 18, and 40 (re Alan's comment) are:
> 
> I edited 9 and 18 and have responded to Alan's comments about 40.
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
> 
> I've re-pushed the branch with the changes I described in response to
> each individual review comment.

Just noticed a build breakage in 28/44 here.  But with that fixed in the
obvious way, the branch has my r-b.

- ajax

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to