Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes: > On Fre, 2014-01-10 at 09:26 +0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >> We're going to want to make this DIX code instead of XF86 if at all >> possible, but for now just disable it so we can work on the rest of >> the build. > > The radeon driver can't really use the in-tree glamor unless it supports > Xv. What's your plan for phasing out the standalone glamor in favour of > the in-tree one?
There's a later set of patches for building the xf86 module and turning on the current XV code. (I still want to rewrite the XV to be dix, which I think involves pulling down the current two identical DDX implementations to mi so that I don't have to write yet annother one). If in-tree glamor isn't better than external glamor by 1.16, the something has gone horribly wrong.
pgpNuwpLBP8Nk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
