On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 14:57:23 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Oops correction I should look closer myself, that is in 2/7 not 3/7 . Anyways > I still believe that using XNFstrdup instead would be better. I don't see why > sloppy coding (lacking error checking is sloppy coding) would be ok in test > cases. > I'd expect that either it's ok for these things to be NULL, or the test will fail when they are?
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
