Hi,

On 11 March 2014 06:31, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 07:10:25PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> There is no need to ensure the pointers passed to free are not NULL,
>> especially right after passing them to strncpy without checking for
>> NULL.
>>
>> Flagged by cppcheck 1.64:
>> [app/xkbcomp/parseutils.c:557] -> [app/xkbcomp/parseutils.c:559]:
>>  (warning) Possible null pointer dereference: over - otherwise it
>>            is redundant to check it against null.
>> [app/xkbcomp/parseutils.c:558] -> [app/xkbcomp/parseutils.c:561]:
>>  (warning) Possible null pointer dereference: under - otherwise it
>>            is redundant to check it against null.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>
>
> series: Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]>

Ditto from me.

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to