On 16/03/2014 18:15, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > On 14-03-15 02:17 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote: >> On 14/03/2014 20:03, Jon TURNEY wrote: >>> As of 9167c5e7177a758fce55afe759fa48c47a4f7f4e we had mesa-demos, mesa-glut >>> and >>> mesa-glu modules. >>> >>> 9167c5e7177a758fce55afe759fa48c47a4f7f4e "add missing modules and meta >>> modules" >>> (confusingly) removes them. >>> >>> Restore mesa-demos, mesa-glut, mesa-glu so they get tinderboxed. >> Sorry, that was completely the wrong patch. Try the attached, instead. >> > > The reason I had not included these is that they are not needed to build > a runnable X Window System, to my knowledge (I could be wrong on that).
Okay. But xorg.modules contains lots of stuff which isn't required for that (e.g. app-xman), and if it's going to drive tinderbox, it should, I think, build as much stuff as we can stand, so that commits which break something have more chance to be noticed as soon as possible. > I noticed the patch was reverted. With my usual bumbling incompetence, I typed 'git push' into the wrong terminal and pushed the unreviewed, broken version of this patch, so I also pushed a revert. > As for fontconfig, I always hesitated. It has been available on all > platforms for the longest time, I never understood why it was included. > And we don't need the latest unreleased version. This is a separate issue, but again, unless it is tinderboxed elsewhere, I wouldn't want to see it removed. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
