On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 17:13:41 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > The attack surface for indirect GLX is huge, and it's of no use to > most people (if you get an indirect GL context, you're better served > by a immediate X error than actually trying to use an indirect GL > context and finding out that it doesn't support doing anything you > want, slowly). This flag gives you a chance to disable indirect GLX > in environments where you just don't need it. > > I put in both the '+' and '-' arguments right now, so that it's easy > to patch the value to change the default policy. > --- > glx/glxcmds.c | 10 ++++++++++ > include/opaque.h | 1 + > os/utils.c | 8 ++++++++ > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > Acked-by: Julien Cristau <[email protected]>
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
