Patch 4 and 5 can be dropped, I looked at Keith's code and it does the same thing already (also tested OpenTTD and it works with Keith's code). Patch 1 is still valid.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote: > AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone > glamor tree since it was imported into the xserver tree. > > Patch 4 involves changes to the PutImage path which conflict with Keith's > pending rework of that, but the other parts of it are required for patch > 5 AFAICT. Patch 5 in turn could be dropped in favour of Keith's 'Add > glamor_program based copy acceleration' change in his glamor-server > branch. But either that or patch 5 is necessary e.g. to make the game > OpenTTD playable (at least on Radeons). > > I've only lightly tested these so far. > > [PATCH 1/5] glamor: Fix coordinates handling for composite > [PATCH 2/5] glamor: Fix memory leak in _glamor_copy_n_to_n() > [PATCH 3/5] glamor: Fallback to system memory when fail to allocate > [PATCH 4/5] glamor: Add in support for the stride parameter when > [PATCH 5/5] glamor: Optimization to copy area when the source doesn't > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel >
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
