Eric Anholt <[email protected]> writes: > That said, why do GLAMOR_DRM_ONLY pixmaps even exist? From a quick tour > of the glamor_egl.c paths that set_pixmap_type(pixmap, GLAMOR_DRM_ONLY) > and the associated radeon code, it looks like a DRM_ONLY pixmap should > be immediately getting thrown away to use a normal pixmap insted.
Yeah, that was my question -- how can we do X to an object where we cannot ever see the pixels? Ignoring fallbacks, we still need to support GetImage and PutImage somehow. -- [email protected]
pgpILAi7oBJqM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
