On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:52:34PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 06/ 1/14 08:18 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >Trying to meet a hard-to-test standard of /bin/sh is unnecessary for a script > >that's only run by maintainers. For now, simply force bash but don't change > >any of the script, over time we can update this to support true bashism like > >[[ ]]. > > > >Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > >--- > > release.sh | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/release.sh b/release.sh > >index e5774c2..a8d3451 100755 > >--- a/release.sh > >+++ b/release.sh > >@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > >-#!/bin/sh > >+#!/bin/bash > > # > > # Creates and upload a git module tarball > > # > > > > Fine by me for Solaris - every non-EOL version has bash available, just > not installed as /bin/sh. I can't speak for the other platforms though. > > Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> >
As far as OpenBSD is concerned I don't care. OpenBSD doesn't have /bin/bash but I could cope with that locally next time I need it. -- Matthieu Herrb _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
