On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> writes: > > > After several complaints about this revert from users of other DEs > > (because it broke their systray icons again), I tried to reproduce the > > kwin problem shown on > > http://markus.members.selfnet.de/xorg/glamor_kwin.png without the revert > > again, but couldn't. Markus, can you still reproduce this problem > > without the revert? If yes, please provide detailed instructions to > > reproduce. If not, it was probably fixed by something else in the > meantime. > > I think I understand the code and now believe that both the original > fixed versions are incorrect. However, I cannot reproduce any of the > problems we've had reported. I've placed an explanation of the bug and > the fix in the patch attached here. In theory, this should fix *both* > the original kwin problem and the systray icons. I would love to see > this tested soon if possible. I wouldn't mind slipping this into 1.16; > it seems "low risk" to me, and solves a fairly serious regression with > glamor. > > The patch fixes the systray icon issue that I have experienced, thanks. > > > -- > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel >
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
