I thought of <equal> <less> to match <equal> <greater>, but it is even more confusing.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Alan Coopersmith < [email protected]> wrote: > On 07/31/14 06:23 PM, Gabriel Souza Franco wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Souza Franco <[email protected]> >> --- >> nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre b/nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre >> index 23829b4..4a96570 100644 >> --- a/nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre >> +++ b/nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre >> @@ -4535,6 +4535,7 @@ XCOMM Part 3 >> <Multi_key> <KP_Divide> <U2194> : "↮" U21AE # LEFT RIGHT ARROW >> WITH STROKE >> <Multi_key> <less> <minus> : "←" U2190 # LEFTWARDS ARROW >> <Multi_key> <minus> <greater> : "→" U2192 # RIGHTWARDS ARROW >> + <Multi_key> <equal> <greater> : "⇒" U21D2 # RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE >> ARROW >> <Multi_key> <U2203> <U0338> : "∄" U2204 # THERE DOES NOT EXIST >> <Multi_key> <braceleft> <braceright> : "∅" U2205 # EMPTY SET >> <Multi_key> <U2208> <U0338> : "∉" U2209 # NOT AN ELEMENT OF >> > > Hmm, it's unfortunate that <less> <equal> is already mapped to > "≤" U2264 # LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO > so we can't have it match for the leftwards double arrow, but I'm > not seeing any obvious better suggestions for the mapping, unless > we want to do something like <minus> <minus> <greater> and > <less> <minus> <minus>, but that seems klunkier. > > Anyone else have thoughts or ideas? > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] > Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc >
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
