Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: >> Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> writes: >> >>> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:09 +0200, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> >>>> +CHIPSET(0xA011, IGD_GM, "Intel(R) IGD") >>>> +CHIPSET(0xA001, IGD_G, "Intel(R) IGD") >>> >>> Can we not? Pineview, right? Or "Atom D4xx/D5xx/N4xx/N5xx", or >>> whatever, but "IGD" is worse than useless. >>> >>>> +CHIPSET(0x2E02, g4x, "Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Device") >>> >>> Does this really not have a better name? Can I hope that it simply >>> never shipped outside of an SDV? >> >> Note that inside the X Server, these names aren't being used -- it's >> only in Mesa. Keeping the files unmodified from Mesa means easier >> syncing in the future, though. > > Maybe we can store these in a separate pacakge that can be shared > between multiple components? These are already duplicated in > libdrm_*, mesa, ddx, etc. and now the xserver.
If I was putting effort into reducing PCI ID propagation, I'd be working on getting GLX to sit on top of EGL instead of rolling its own loader. I think ajax had stuff for this at one point?
pgpz4MAgwN71G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
