On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:18:51PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 04.03.2015 21:16, Chris Wilson wrote: > > There is no point in setting up the acceleration for indirect GLX if > > indirect GLX is itself disabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > --- > > glx/glxdri2.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/glx/glxdri2.c b/glx/glxdri2.c > > index ec86a73..7cb0f28 100644 > > --- a/glx/glxdri2.c > > +++ b/glx/glxdri2.c > > @@ -945,6 +945,9 @@ __glXDRIscreenProbe(ScreenPtr pScreen) > > size_t buffer_size; > > ScrnInfoPtr pScrn = xf86ScreenToScrn(pScreen); > > > > + if (!enableIndirectGLX) > > + return NULL; > > + > > screen = calloc(1, sizeof *screen); > > if (screen == NULL) > > return NULL; > > > > Can the GLX visual information still be probed from the DRI driver with > this patch?
No. This patch kills the AIGLX messages and also DRI. Sadly as probing mesa/i965 is the single most CPU expensive step in starting X. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel