On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 08:32 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Doesn't the "smart" scheduler rely on the interrupt behviour as well?
The scare quotes aren't necessary, the smart scheduler really is materially better than the alternative. Try cairo-demo's multi.sh of, say, fish-demo for a nice illustration of the difference. But also, no not really. The timer is only active while we're actually processing requests, and all the handler does is increment a tick counter that we check the next time through the dispatch loop. None of that cares about syscall restarts for correctness. The server in general doesn't do restartable request processing, so even if syscalls did throw EINTR we're not using that as a cue to pause the current client. - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
