Hi,
On 19-10-15 14:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mark Kettenis, le Mon 19 Oct 2015 12:26:27 +0200, a écrit :
If you're doing this with certain platforms in mind, maybe
we need to only not check for libdrm on those platforms ?
Does it make sense at all to use the wrapper on platforms without drm?
We need some setuid wrapper, yes, and we'd like to be able to configure
whether all users can run it, or only users which are loggued on the
console.
We == hurd developers / users here, right ?
I'm not against taking a patch to make this work for you, I'm just
not convinced that unconditionally dropping the libdrm check is a good
idea. I agree that most people who need the wrapper should always be
building with libdrm anyways, but I would like to keep enforcing that.
To me hurd is the exception here. So maybe change the patch to drop
the configure libdrm check for hurd ? If that is done I'm fine with the
#ifdef LIBDRM in the wrapper itself.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
