Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> writes: > If "something" uses xcb (even just sending a request is enough, doesn't have > to > be waiting for a reply), xcb could read an event from its FD and append it to > its internal queue. At this point there is a pending event in the queue, but > the > socket isn't marked readable. With this change, the event won't be removed > from > the queue.
So, if we check for events before going to sleep (in the block handler), that should be sufficient to catch this I think? -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
