On 12 May 2016 at 20:08, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 May 2016 at 17:19, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 14:27:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >>> With previous commits we've hidden a selection of internal symbols from >>> the DSO. Neither of them has been part of the API, although let's do the >>> sane thing and bump the major, as we might have changed things in a >>> backward incompatible way. I.e. we might have unintentionally broken >>> some applications. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> Funny story... seems that the SONAME still uses the non-modular X >>> version (and it hasn't been bumped since the split) while configure uses >>> fresher numbers. >>> >>> Leaning that we should bump at least the SONAME one, although I've did >>> both just in case ;-) >> >> Very much against bumping SONAME. If you think that's needed as a >> result of these patches, then please rethink whether these patches are a >> good idea. >> > To avoid repeating myself I will kindly point you to my earlier reply. > The gist - I don't mind either way. > Just because I don't might which route is taken that doesn't mean that I won't appreciate any input on the topic.
If you can reply to the respective thread that will be appreciated - specific symbol should/shouldn't be exported [1] or only package, SONAME, both or neither should be bumped [2] Thanks Emil [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2016-May/049622.html [2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2016-May/049687.html _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
