Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On 30.05.2016 12:29, Keith Packard wrote: >> Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Let's take things one step at a time, get my patch in as is (which >>> brings us back to where we were before using copies wrt correctness) and >>> then yours on top? >> >> If that makes it easier for you to reason about, then it seems fine to me. > > May I take that as your R-b?
Yes, for your patch: Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
