On 04.08.2016 03:18, Keith Packard wrote: > Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes: > >> I'm afraid that's not feasible: An additional optimization will be to >> never flush for clients which aren't sharing any buffers with the server >> via DRI. Only the driver can keep track of that. > > The DRI3 extension and glamor presumably know about those;
There's also DRI2. > I'm mostly interested in getting as much of this into shared code as > possible so that semantics across drivers are 'the same'. I agree that would be nice, but I just can't see how it's possible. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
