Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes:

> On 15 September 2016 at 20:12, Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
>> On 15/09/2016 14:14, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 September 2016 at 13:06, Jon Turney wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please consider pulling into master.
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> 52d6a1e832a5e62289dd4f32824ae16a78dfd7e8:
>>>>
>>>>   Hold input lock for deviceProc (2016-09-15 07:50:38 +1000)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://people.freedesktop.org/~jturney/xserver
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 7280a41ef26647c27035e51e33c6f3ac5b12e931:
>>>>
>>>>   Add Windows-DRI extension (2016-09-15 12:53:21 +0100)
>>>>
>>> Was meaning to mention this (mesa patches to be precise) but other
>>> things keep on popping:
>>>
>>> Where can one find the windowsdriproto package/repo that this depends on ?
>>
>>
>> Like appledriproto, the headers and .pc currently live in mesa (under
>> src/glx/windows) and are installed by that.
>>
> I'm pretty sure I mentioned/suggested the same thing for appledriproto
> as well ;-)
>
>> I did consider giving it an independent existence, but I'm not sure if
>> that's wanted: there seemed to be a feeling that there are already too many
>> proto repos, and it's not like these proto headers are likely to be used by
>> anything else.
>>
> If people are afraid of "too many" proto repos, they always will be -
> it makes no difference here. Yes, those are not be used by anything
> else (atm) yet one shouldn't "clump" things based on that merit alone,
> no ?

The solution to too many proto repos is to be using xcb instead.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to