Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <> writes:

> Yeah, I made the change mainly to shutup the analyzer while I was
> looking for other races.  I decided to propose it in case we want to
> be strict here.

Thanks. Keeping our request processing overhead low seems important
enough to me that we should skip this patch, although perhaps adding a
comment before the test noting that we are intentionally not holding the
input lock.

Is there some way we can annotate the code to silence the analyzer in
these cases?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________ X.Org development

Reply via email to