On 23/09/16 04:57 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > The copy optimization in d37329cba42fa8e72fe4be8a7be18e512268b5bd > replicated a bug from last time we did a copy optimization, and didn't > get rendercheck run on it.
Actually, I'm pretty sure I did run rendercheck, but didn't notice the regression due to the radeonsi bug affecting the same test. Please consider removing that language from the commit log. > This is effectively a re-cherry-pick of > 510c8605641803f1f5b5d2de6d3bb422b148e0e7. > > Fixes rendercheck -t blend -o src -f x4r4g4b4,x3r4g4b4 > > v2: Drop excessive src->depth == dst->depth check that snuck in. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > --- > > Michel, I didn't apply your review becuase you said "second clause", > but I removed the first of the two. Is there any case where the drawable depths don't match, but a copy does what's expected? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel