When putting a device node into a poll-request list, do not overwrite a "please-remove" element with the same fd, so that a closed device file is ospoll_remove'd prior to being ospoll_add'ed.
Before, the opposite order was possible, resulting in ospoll_add considering the newly opened file being already polled, should it have a fd for which the "please-remove" has not been procesed yet. In this case, no further events would be seen from the device. Signed-off-by: Mihail Konev <[email protected]> Regressed-in: 52d6a1e832a5e62289dd4f32824ae16a78dfd7e8 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97880 Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/113763/ Hit-and-Reduced-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Reviewed-and-Reduced-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> --- os/inputthread.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/os/inputthread.c b/os/inputthread.c index 6aa0a9ce6fb5..ddafa7fe8343 100644 --- a/os/inputthread.c +++ b/os/inputthread.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ InputThreadRegisterDev(int fd, dev = NULL; xorg_list_for_each_entry(old, &inputThreadInfo->devs, node) { - if (old->fd == fd) { + if (old->fd == fd && old->state != device_state_removed) { dev = old; break; } @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ InputThreadRegisterDev(int fd, dev->readInputProc = readInputProc; dev->readInputArgs = readInputArgs; dev->state = device_state_added; + + /* Do not prepend, so that any dev->state == device_state_removed + * with the same dev->fd get processed first. */ xorg_list_append(&dev->node, &inputThreadInfo->devs); } -- 2.9.2 _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
