On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 08:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > I've said it before a couple of times, but it stands: The next step for > epoxy is that someone needs to look into YaronCT's fork and decide if we > should just bless it as the maintained upstream.
Just read through the diff between your branch and Yaron's, it all looks good to me. Including a epoxy_egl_get_current_gl_context_api fix that I'd independently written long after the fact. I'll move my pull requests over. - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
