On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:12:54 -0500 Owen Taylor <otay...@fishsoup.net> wrote:
> Hi Pekka, > > I don't have a lot of of commentary to add here. Certainly getting the > frame-sync protocols right does require integration between Xwayland and > the compositing manager. I don't think there's that much virtue in spending > time on the extended version of the sync protocol and > _NET_WM_FRAME_TIMINGS, because, to my knowledge, those are implemented only > by GTK+ 3, and most GTK+ 3 apps will be running as native Wayland apps. On > the other hand, gtk2 and qt4 X clients will be around to exercise the basic > version of the protocol for the forseeable future. Hi Owen, that's valuable, saves me the effort of designing for and maybe implementing the extended version. :-) I'm kind of curious though why no other toolkit saw the benefit of the extended sync protocol. Thanks, pq
pgpCSDHm8qtjg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
