On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 09:09 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > > > This really isn't especially useful, and we'd rather not be in the > > business of supporting arbitrary pixel formats. > > I recall playing with this when I heard of a strange piece of hardware > DEC was planning on making (depth 1, 8 bpp), but it wasn't all that > useful. > > However, I'd say it remains useful for testing software rendering code > for depth 12, 15 and 30. Those are no longer included in the default set > of depths provided by vfb, leaving us no easy way to validate them.
I'm thinking we could just make the pixmap format list constant: depths 1, 4, 8, 12, 15, 16, 18, 24, 30, 32. (Yes 18, apparently r6g6b6 is a thing.) Why leave anything out, after all. - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
