On 09/02/17 03:06 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:57 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> >> wrote: >>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >>> >>> The lower layers also do this, but no damage may be reported there, >>> since we unwrap before calling down. >>> >>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 >>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >> >> Makes sense to me. >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > > Mmm. I might like the original patch better, I think I'd rather have > composite be aware of how damage works than damage be aware of every > possible way a caller might abuse it. So I reserve the right to flip > this back the other way at some point in the future, if we ever get > around to dix-level damage.
I'm not sure which caller you're referring to or how it's abusing damage, but okay. > But this does work, and I do give preference to patches that other > people review instead of things I have to review as the last resort, > so, merged: Thanks! -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel