Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes:

> looking at this again because I realised that timers are used as well and it
> turns out they already have input_lock(), see 8174daa6bd3f. Can we just use
> input_lock()/input_unlock() here rather than a new mutex?

A fine plan. We should call this the 'BXL' -- the Big X server Lock :-)

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to