On 13/04/17 12:52 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > Pali Rohár <[email protected]> writes: > >> Current usage of DisplayWidthMM() and DisplayHeightMM() does not make sense >> for multi-monitor configuration. In most cases DPI is set to 96 as there is >> no sane value. >> >> Instead when XRANDR 1.2 extension is supported, report dimensions and >> resolution information per XRANDR monitor output. It should provide >> correct DPI value. > > I'd be happy for this to be reported as additional information, but I > suspect there are numerous shell scripts which parse the old information > which will get confused by any change in the format.
In which case it should probably only be printed with -ext RANDR, to be consistent with other extensions. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
