Quoting Daniel Martin (2017-11-21 01:59:42) > Hi, > > I've ever wondered why are the proto headers split up into distinct > repos? (It takes "ages" to just copy (install) a few files with > autotools.) > > Dylan started to add meson support, but doing this for all protos > sounds like a lot of copy'n'paste to do, lots of patches . Wouldn't it > make more sense in general to merge all proto repos into one (meson > only) and have options if you don't want a specific proto to be > installed as we do with xcb? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > PS: A quick search revealed that a merge is possible even with keeping > the history.
For reference here's the proto packages that archlinux provides: bigreqsproto compositeproto damageproto dmxproto dri2proto dri3proto fixesproto fontsproto glproto inputproto kbproto libxdmcp presentproto printproto randrproto recordproto renderproto resourceproto scrnsaverproto videoproto xcmiscproto xextproto xf86dgaproto xf86driproto xf86vidmodeproto xineramaproto
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
