On 3 March 2018 at 01:05, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > Both autotools and meson build systems had complicated logic around > what version of libdrm to require for various options. Remove that and > just check for a new enough version to support all of the options > which need libdrm. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> > --- > configure.ac | 7 +------ > meson.build | 12 ++---------- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 439d42390..0ba7550a1 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1281,12 +1281,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(DRI3, test "x$DRI3" = xyes) > if test "x$DRI" = xyes || test "x$DRI2" = xyes || test "x$DRI3" = xyes || > test "x$CONFIG_UDEV_KMS" = xyes; then > if test "x$DRM" = xyes; then > AC_DEFINE(WITH_LIBDRM, 1, [Building with libdrm support]) > - if test "x$DRI2" = xyes; then > - dnl 2.4.65 is required for drmGetDevice > - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBDRM], libdrm >= 2.4.65) > - else > - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBDRM], $LIBDRM) > - fi > + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBDRM], $LIBDRM) Seems like you missed the version here. LIBDRM is some very ancient version, just enough for kdriver/xwayland.
-Emil _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
