On 2 April 2018 at 20:34, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 16:41 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Why do we have the explicit _rec and _ptr typecasts to begin with? > > Convention, mostly. The typedef for the struct is because 'struct' is a > dumb word to need to say all the time. The typedef for the pointer is > vaguely distasteful and I've been trying to stop. > s/dumb/annoying/
Using _t suffix over _rec seems more indicative IMHO. Regardless, most of the series is a must have for 1.20 - if you want to give it a skim that'll be appreciated. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
