On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 21:30 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 22:15 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Gently reminder of this patch. Can you comment/review it? > > > > Nack. The whole point of (that part of) xdpyinfo is to show you what > > was sent in the initial connection block. xrandr already exists, and > > code exists that depends on xdpyinfo's output. > > Would it make sense to add the output from RANDR via an explicit `-ext > RANDR` query similar to what is already done for XINERAMA, > XInputExtension, etc?
If it's going to be in xdpyinfo at all - and I kinda don't think it needs to be, given xrandr already exists, but I don't insist on that - then yes, it should be behind -ext RANDR. - ajax _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
