> Michal Srb <m...@suse.com> hat am 7. Juni 2018 um 16:01 geschrieben: > > > On čtvrtek 7. června 2018 14:59:44 CEST Walter Harms wrote: > > I was thinking about a more permanent solution and sofar i see the correct > > way would to add the two functions to libXau since i do not see that other > > applications would be more clever that xauth. > > That would be nice, sadly libXau does not provide any functions to manipulate > the list of xauth records. Just functions for writing and reading of a single > record, locking and matching. > > One option would be to change the semantics of XauGetBestAuthByAddr to return > the most precise match first, instead of returning the first match of any > kind. But I don't think changing that behavior is good idea. > > Alternatively we can just take the patch #1, so that xauth does overwrite > records with other random records. I believe that is correct fix. And we can > ignore this patch #2 that does the sorting. I could probably workaround my > issue by invoking xauth differently. (I could create 1-item list first > containing the new record and then merge the original list into it, so the new > > record will end up on top.) > > Michal Srb
I am waiting if someone will complain, if nothing happens until fr. i will see to add your patch and will mail you for testing. re, wh _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
