On Mon, May 13, 2019, 4:00 PM Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2019-05-11 at 21:17 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > > Given that the xf86-video-intel repo hasn't been been set up for PRs > > it seems (as opposed to lets say the xserver). > > I see in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel > > the following people having made the most recent changes: > > > > Ville Syrjälä: [email protected] (found via a commit > > message with sign-off tag) > > Eric Anholt: [email protected] > > Adam Jackson: [email protected] > > I don't have an active development interest in the intel driver, I just > ship it. My most recent patch was just because I couldn't get it to > build on 32-bit in Fedora, and I wasn't the one that merged it. In > general I try not to force-push patches to drivers that have active > maintenance. Which intel does have, despite the lack of releases; > people pretty much just use git snapshots and that seems to be > sufficient. > > The intel driver hasn't migrated to gitlab yet, Intel have internal > processes that revolve around bugzilla and the mailing list still > AFAIK. intel-gfx@ was the right place to send the patch. > > - ajax >
Thanks for taking the time to explain that. I'll look into submitting the patch on bugzilla.freedesktop.org. --Adam >
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
