You might get more attention by mailing the xcb-specific mailing list,
as noted on https://xcb.freedesktop.org/ and in the xcbproto/README.md.

But then again, you may just find that there are so few developers left,
that there is no one who has both the knowledge and time to review
something like this.   That is an unfortunate risk of spending your time
on projects that others have left to slowly die.

        -alan-

On 6/28/24 05:33, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
Could I have please a judgement, one way or the other, about what I
have done?

If the developers don't want what I have done, please just say so.

TIA

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:01:30AM +0200, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
Hello,

Could I have some feedback please ?

TIA

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:33:21AM +0200, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
Is it OK? If there are things that someone doesn't think I have done
right, please give feedback---I have, I think, answered about Python
handling knowing that on OSes python third partie packages handling
is not a simple matter.

Can I go on with other modules?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:24:48PM +0200, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
The support for Meson has been added, and the CI builds and checks
Autotools vs. Meson builds.

The byte-compilation of Python modules generates identical files due
to:
        - DESTDIR correct support in the (added) compile_py.sh (note:
        python compileall module doesn't work correctly);

        - Python support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, allowing (in the CI
pipeline) to define a global such variable and then to obtain this
date in the byte-compiled versions in two distinct jobs running at
differing times;

The generated pc files are compared using the (added)
xorg/util/modular/auto-meson-pc-cmp.sh, that compares the results
semantically and not literally.

The doc here:

https://notes.kergis.com/x11_building.html


--
         Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ kergis +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
                     http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C


--
        -Alan Coopersmith-                 alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
         Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris

Reply via email to