--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? It shouldn't be hard for someone with the hardware to port the r300
> bits.
...
> I did the initial implementation for r300 and i915tex.
OK, so if you give me a few signposts to follow I'll give it a bash, although
I'm not familiar
with the internals of the DRI code. Just so long as I don't need to reference
any hardware
information. (And the R100 driver too?)
> > Would I lose access to the second 128 MB of my 256 MB Radeon 9200 card
> > if I did use it? The Xorg.0.log file says that it can only access the
> > first 128 MB on my card directly.
>
> You can't lose it because nothing's currently using it. The drivers
> could be extended to use it for 3D textures or EXA offscreen pixmaps
> relatively easily though.
Ah, I thought that something *was* using it. Perhaps it's just EXA then?
(Sheesh, so much for my
256 MB card.)
Cheers,
Chris
___________________________________________________________
What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your
email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship.
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk
_______________________________________________
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
