http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13964
------- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 12:05 PST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Still looks to me like the EDID data from your monitor is bogus. It wouldn't > be > the first which has the size correct (in cm) in the basic display information > block, but fails to provide the correct value (in mm) in the detailed timing > blocks. Though that's assuming that EDID 1.0 even has that information (EDID > 1.1 certainly does). > I do not know if the correct information is in the detailed timing blocks. That is why I have sent my logs and ddcprobe and xrandr probes to you programmers to decipher. However, if the driver now so precariously depends on inconsistently formated hardware display information yet the correct size information in cm is still there as you say. Why don't you adapt the driver software accordingly? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
