> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:23:34 +1000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> 
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Luc Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >  >  > Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason 
> > to
> >  >  > still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree?
> >
> >  yeah, doesn't really matter to me.
> >
> 
> Splitting the -ati wrapper out even further would be nice, I'd still
> like to have it as we need to not trash current users
> xorg.conf.
> 
> Granted we could just special case ati in the server ;-)
> 

The ati wrapper still detects and loads the appropriate sub-driver.
People need not change their xorg.conf. If you make -ati depend on -mach64 
-r128 and -radeon, users should not notice.

George.



_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati

Reply via email to