On Wednesday 06 October 2010 00:52:27 Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Die, 2010-10-05 at 08:10 +0200, Oldřich Jedlička wrote: > > On Monday 04 October 2010 17:12:41 Alex Deucher wrote: > > > 2010/10/4 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: > > > > On Son, 2010-10-03 at 10:25 +0200, Oldřich Jedlička wrote: > > > >> v5: Distribute list.h as xorg_list.h, remove xorg-server version > > > >> check. Use the version from xorg-server when available (checked in > > > >> configure.ac). > > > > > > > > IMHO this is overkill. I'd still suggest only building the code that > > > > needs list.h directly or indirectly when it's available from the X > > > > server. > > > > > > > > But of course, if Dave or Alex think this is the way to go, I don't > > > > mind this going in. > > > > > > I agree with Michel, but I don't mind either way. > > > > Ok, so version 4 (sent on 19.9.2010) should be enough. I've received no > > reaction, so I've tried also this one :-) > > Didn't you see > > http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-driver-ati/2010-September/017137.html > > ? Instead of failing to build with certain xserver snapshots, please > just don't build all the code that can't build or work properly without > list.h when it's not available.
Ah, now I see. I've received it, but I understood it differently - especially the words that it's not a big deal. I thought that my check is acceptable, but you ment to don't build the block. Thanks, I will change it. Oldrich. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
