On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Witold Baryluk <[email protected]> wrote: > > So why there are two incompatible drivers, especially when radeon looks > to be providing framebuffer anyway? Is radeonfb module supporting even > some older hardware so it is keeped in kernel?
radeon covers all hw radeonfb covers and more. The reason radeonfb is still around is that it covers a few corner cases (suspend and resume on ppc mac cards) which hasn't been ported over to radeon yet. On x86, there is no reason to use radeonfb. Alex _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
