https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35457
--- Comment #39 from d4ddi0 <[email protected]> 2012-05-06 11:36:54 PDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Since this bug was reported over a year ago and no real progress has been made > in fixing it, may I ask a knowledgeable person what the last working version > of > the code was, before this bug was introduced? Is there any way to create a > "radeon-unsupported" module for those of us who have chipsets X.org doesn't > plan to support with their newer versions? The simple answer is that (afaik) this particular hardware set of hardware has had trouble since kernel mode-setting was introduce. There is not going to be a git bisect-able place where the problem started happening. ... I do have a question for devs... I have been all over the initialization code and I cannot find a place where the sideport RAM is treated as distinct from the UMA "vram". Is this stuff set up by the atombios? Is there a way to see what hardware addresses ranges are assigned? Is there a way to fix the GART (table) if the bios is setting up overlapping or otherwise broken addresses for GTT, UMA and sideport vram? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
